Albuquerque protest

Sort of reminds me of this science fiction dystopia where organs were harvested from 'non human' entities, or if in the parlance of double speak being loud were qualification?!

Curious to know if being signed up for a postcard to come and visit some visiting proctologist s for a given Mayo clinic was a harmless bit?

You were dealing with a drought not just in terms of seismic activity but rainfall likewise in California...you see I get handed a high water bill when it floods sometimes so...

you guys up to throwing nukes at tornadoes again?!  :)

I was born on Gillham rd btw its a joke...you know Ukraine and Crimea...bad joke maybe, but a joke.

So I hear that new film Noah's a big blockbuster hit!!!!

Shut up about clickbait

If it were left at clickbait no problems...secondly, no adSense at my site.

Or it seems there is always another interests running with Fink code?!  For one set of propaganda another with its own self serving interests.

Sure some sell the idea that we are sold on the idea of personal threat (the wolf at the door), to convince us the world is really that much more safe then it really is (hence The Village mentality) is a sort of slighting anachronism to the modern rational thinker (especially when there is so much of our lives to be shared), and then the other part of that reality is that few seem to suggest that the Sexual revolution today were ever much of a good idea likewise...hence, free love isn't the same relative to what it once were (problems with any number of sexually transmitted diseases??), or that reality between these two diametrically opposed views if they could be considered that were somewhere in between as a medium.  Its not exactly as safe as one should hope to believe in being free, and not exactly as bad supposedly, and then it leaves one potentially in the case of neither desiring to know what and where any given threshold exists...or its seems harder not to walk out the door and feel something sketchy and off were going on given the right day and context more often then not.  This is to say, that 'happy go lucky' seems to be on the decline?!  And by the way, do I seem an angry non sensible hyper paranoid right wing nut job?!

   Then leaving off its not hard to see that few like to contemplate the problems of the world in the fullest depth or extent, and generally speaking if playing the odds statistically, who knows maybe this were the same as the chances of being struck be an asteroid, or depending on the nature of one's existence, the sort of odds, that has an aging disease for more likely in one's circumstance even at such a young age?!  This hadn't excluded the possible logic of being cherry picked or that only decades later, formal apologies could be stated by senior politicians for the occurrence and wrongful behaviors of past peoples, or that for the rest of the world relevancy were more vital words...and generally if it were 'why bother' it leads to 'why state' and the endless argument that circularly finds itself working upon the same thing over again, or stating futility of the matter neither seems to end discussions, or that one somewhere continues to state what should seem 'futile' to the rest of the world...and that were likely a reality of human nature.  Isn't it strange that people do this despite the odds of fear, repression, and any manner of circumstances to be had or faced?!  Social control is a hard end to wrap up completely at times isn't it?!

Recalling the sound of potential disgust when a local radio stations DJ sounds as though an uninvited guest were there to warrant the air waves, if for the better part of the day, and a given station should amusingly enough run on about hand puppets and masturbation (for the short duration that I would listen to this laughable segment), mind you, not on private radio, and generally off hours for the Howard Stern types, but at least social control (state propaganda) of this sort were amusingly tame.

  

Response to an article

Accused craigslist killer says two potential victims escaped death paper

There are a number of problems to the logic that I would ever respond to a craigslist ad for a random personal invitation on the premise of loneliness.  The primary reason, however, is that I never respond to these solicitations period, or that I date randomly, or date period...and secondly, I am not really surprised.

Generally I watch the drinking.  I don't go out much really to bars at all...last time I set foot in a bar period prior to a year ago were years in the making...I don't go to music events or events in general much.  I don't really talk to people that I don't know that well, except in limited ways online.

If it wasn't enough to deal with street theater on way too many occasions, its probably a big clue that things aren't what they seem, and when you deal with enough role playing where people are deceiving, lying, or engaged in some form of concealment, they are likely not serving your best interests at heart.  Anyways, its the sort of sense that one has over the years, that much isn't exactly what it seems, dealt enough with naive situations where in retrospect I wondered whether I would be waking up (yeah, homophobic hostiles near  El Paso)...sadly and I am not sure if its on a point of good humor or what I slept generally through the whole ordeal, something like hearing a shit blowing wind but not really doing much, which one should hope characterizes the lot, or sadly if playing the lottery here, I've managed to survive up to this point.

Death Squads

Death Squads

I leave at that for now.  Did a brief internet search on the subject matter, pulling interesting search results.  Normally you'd think this were supposed to be frightening enough, but sadly its one topic that likely surfaces more so in the speech of human rights advocates, and not a typified American household one should imagine.
Or as an old civil war tune on the matter of Quantrill raids likened of the Bushwackers, '...like so many demons raised up from hell...'

Kansas City area problems

By the way, I tend to like to make decisions more spontaneous, while there may be predictive aspects in a historical context, on the other hand, its simply to ensure that mind reading isn't always fruitful or productive in determining with strong accuracy likely outcomes.  The more obvious reason for this is to the limit the impacts of behavioral predictions, unfortunately this is the world we live in...my suggestion avoid saying where you are going aloud, and try not to make yourself too predictable, avoid using Google for search on local businesses, or places used for places of destination if you suspect you are being targeted.  I don't recommend internet food ordering, or online reservation processing at least if you suspect you are being watched, targeted, followed.  Sadly enough while generally I keep social contact very limited (maybe I receive a personal call...non business/soliciting type once a year if that at best), those that do attempt to personally contact seem to indicate invariably something of knowledge with respect to personal information that I have not divulged, and seem to initiate contact in some cases for this expressed purpose alone, and potentially to express implicitly threatening behavior, but that's another matter.  I would indicate at this point, further, generally, I don't believe this were isolated to one individual, or merely a handful of individuals.  Its generally something that has been dealt with over the years running on approximately well over a decade now.  It has little to do with being there to protect people or serve the interests of security in this area, and is basically outright, in my opinion, violation of laws.

By the way, I'd make a nice steady prediction in the next decade or so (if not sooner) that my revelations will not be a shock to anyone (if it isn't already to most whom know better)...this past decade has been relatively shittier relative to any decades that I could recall in the past, but hey that's my personal experience, or at least if you wonder what this present generation looks like...it seems more like a 'look the other way' generation is slating the next generation for big rebellion, but that's likely a decade or so off, I'd imagine, or at least I am sure if you know anything of social theory, its oscillatory in nature, and usually for bullshit there's always a modulating social rebound.

Crazy

So are you watching for the goofy sort of crap 80s shit like Ace of Base (crypto fascist) coupled with New Order tunes?

Sort of interesting seeing this Miley Cyrus ad with Chevy Revolt sponsor...or the Revolt appears to be a new car model I see :)

What's up with this Montana Wild Hack business?!  I'm not sure if it would suck living under the glass dome just outside Saturn you know, under the big brother watchful eye?!  :)

I always wondered what the fake flowers on a wooden pole business was about...or had the feeling I could be living way North in a city that looked like the one I thought I lived in, or that really something odd were going on.  Its hard to know these days isn't it?!  My plastic flowers were really growing when watered?!

If you wondered how much time and money could be spent in a system to produce absolutely nothing worthwhile, or keeping in mind that the exchange here were so occupationally intensive and absurd up to this point.

Nature versus Nuture more of the same

    Nature versus Nurture..if you think your desire is natural in the context of biology say in terms of sexual preferences...no it may not be so clear cut as genetics, and it may not be so clear cut as defined by nurture alone.  As it turns out genetics may play some role to the degree of preference, thinking that you are attracted in some way to shapely symmetries (this seems to be at times a more universal biological characteristic), but on the other hand, what clearly remains a characteristic describing one's desire is a matter that seems arbitrary...for instance, why do shapes and sizes, and other attributes of social desire seem to evolve in cultures which point to some arbitrary factors, or factors which appear very much relative to a given a culture at any given time frame.  More so it seems if we are raised with any sets of genetic potentials that are expressed in the outcomes of our individuals preferences and desires, these weightings may at times be arguably more pronounced in certain ways, or less pronounced in other ways.  As it turns out there may be some genes which govern the degree in which we are stimulated by our given environment, but in other ways are actions in such environment may be more likely hallmarked by the degree in which nurture has factored into our perceptions of the world, or if you thought otherwise, there is likely less the absolute of either, but combinations of influences between both sets which help to the govern the degree in which we are.  In either case, if often we were to preface, unnatural, or describe in absolutist ways, a given nature, it seems at times more characteristically hallmarked by collective social conditioning, or at times this could also be relative to larger predominant population sets with certain expressed genetics.  In either case, if you've heard it argued in some many ways that something of behavior were 'harmful' or genetically against 'nature' itself, more often one could think this born invariably of ignorance on the matter.

Consider animals in nature that mimic the opposite sex as a survival strategy, now apparently evolution hasn't excluded the concept of feminine adaptations among male biological counterparts, or at least for some animal species this strategy seems perfectly fine...so is it against nature for something to assume or adopt feminine characteristics or vice versa?!  Or consider something like the more spontaneous sexual changes in animals when population subset of one sex seems to fall below a given threshold?!  Were expressed spontaneous sexual differentiation against nature or creation in this way?!  Or relative to us these animals seem to find some positive survival strategy and nature has provided enough of niche for the existence of such...at least if we weren't to artificially exclude (in this in the unnatural sense).  And where it seems likewise the complexity of neuronal computational power has diminished, and the context of asexuality as in the more simpler of life form where invariably it is harder to argue by degree that social exchange were a limiting factor with respect to the degree of sexual description, harder is to offer that nurture is exclusive to evolutionary policy making.
Of course, the cost of exclusions may have benefit, if it were likely to the degree that cancer were expressed significantly in populations prior to sexual reproductive ability to regenerate any such expressed genetic tendency (if it were such the case), then likely few offspring should as likely produce a predominantly non recessive expression of such genetics, but likely the reality of recess is exactly that, its a hidden and unseen thing which crucially defies and cleverly hides itself, so that even our reproductive selective natures couldn't as well see the culprit (without modern medicines) that would so warrant and likely dictate the possibility of discerning what truly should seem 'unnatural' versus 'natural' to us, but even there, the context of nature may be more complexly characterized by offsets of 'good' and 'bad'.  A given genetic risk  may also produce some positive advantages in other ways, or at times are genes may be wholly not all bad, not all good, but really mixed bag.  The good news for this, is that you or I (being as natural as one should hope we are) are not clearly the most efficient, the most productive species, or maybe even the most intelligent ounce for ounce relative to the potentially engineered stuff, but we have such a mixed bag also of genes, that when the reaper falls, enough of our population survives and isn't genetically bottle necked...

Often times, on the opposite side of the spectrum, sometimes, I wonder, how much influence nurture is expressed in our genetics likewise...from the epigenetic standpoint, if we were more likely to be influenced as smokers or drinkers alike because of the decision making of our ancestors, it seems the unclear division or line could be even blurry in so far as the persistence of our decision making and desires, or that more likely despite all matter of attempts by parenting otherwise, our carboholic sugary desires may have some genetic factorization likewise.  This isn't to say that components of social decision making our nurture can't be discounted none the less.

Obviously genetics may be less likely to provide us with high level abstract languages (outside of inherent abilities to read our parent's body language even before we have spoken or written anything), or that how we might identify more strongly in social groups, provides a more likely readied synergy for societies to operate on given the principal strength of length minds and potential unity concerning the matter of decision making.  Our civilization is born of the backbone of recorded and transmitted knowledge, and that genetics alone could only pale in the synthesis of providing an education and/or time spent luxuries where other life has less, or at least this should seem much more irrelevant to the nature of survival there, and then alone our genetics outside of nurture should leave us more likely stranded, I think of a cat that the family home adopted years ago...more likely living a solo life, skinny, less sheltered, and unable to fend for itself in the same ways that wild animals of long since genetic departure, are able to move adept to a given environment without the same needs.  Then remembering a show some months ago I'd watch on the History channel running to the tune of apocalypse, some theories would range that our domesticated friends in our absence might survive to the tune of decades, or a century(?!) at best.  It seems inevitably the consequence of our trait selection should seem that much irrelevant to the nature that once bore such creation, and, here, likely the consequence of trait selection, would mean abilities like hibernation, physical traits, or selectivity would breed an animal less likely the same sorts of power, stamina, or in general, with persistent shelter the necessity for something as simple as thick furs and so forth to withstand colder extremes, alongside lost social natures and propensities to appropriately self den(?), and for this exchange, change in social psychologies.  An animal less more likely to stay put could be a more then likely dead animal in the wild, contrary to man's learned ability to paradoxically counter migration by way of agriculture and civilization.  Sure maybe some inherent landscape provides enough of a niche for the lotus eaters but this were likely short change for the abundance otherwise.  I contemplated myself briefly as a stone age hunter, how long would I last?!  In all honesty most survivalists don't talk of a matter of extended stay tours here, its a matter of getting back into the grid in some way shape or form as soon as possible, not attempting to live outside of it, not at least without tools, without machinery likely, or some form of reproducing food sources, or having a readied abundance to aid here, and then likely requisite migratory knowledge as in instinct of knowing where to go to the bounty if and when long since departed, and bounty is a relative word, that might have required as in the more herbivore inclined, root plants in the off season, and fruits in the seasonal prime (if you were lucky enough for say the tropical), and then despite relatively small geographic location, the sustenance while seemingly lesser to choose from could be exceeding in some cases to the culinary habits even of some humans, and likely the produce ranging could generally be described as exotic to the commonplace supermarket (save, for instance, as in one thought instance varieties of wild ginger).