Selection theory and human behavior

   I might agree it seems if anything of at times social movements should trend.  Sadly of embedding of a given 'social' Darwinism a given..  Though I am not certain how R/K selection is applied supposedly in all of this since in popularized science, the term 'rate' is less often used in describing the population models outright as it were factored to the notion of 'rate' as attached to 'education' or 'economy'.  As theorist offer, where perceptive fear appears to be a more common factor in relating to childhood mortality, likely increasing population size of offspring which in turn translates into a greater chance of survival of some offspring as opposed to the models of selectivity in another part of the world which offers less of the horrors of childhood mortality.  Though for any detractors, it also seems harder in outright stating there isn't sadly some truth by this, however, objectionable all of this is in so far as social behaviors.  Objection, I stress, is given to the notion of 'useful idiocy' in all of this...namely that 'K' selection offer  'superior' versus 'inferior' traits in following.  All of this for 'social hegemony' though, a class of 'ickkks' are defined and all the 'weeds' are supposedly a given for the offing.  In a given contrast of the world though as popularized in the movie 'Idiocracy' describes the K world has having changed in a given future more to the R selection world.  Though on the matter of gray area K and R might be supposed more mixed in the Americas relative to Europe.  Likely, however, there could be a misnomer to the notion of social values in all of this which speaks more of the artificiality of any monolithic K selection sub culture.  That is, perhaps, by elite classes, K selection abounds most powerfully, but there could be a vast and wide gray area on the matter of socio-economic classes and K selection relative to R selection.  As it served to the notion of any programmed social structure, it is not without a good dosing that the young male offspring is attentive supposedly to this...video games which speak of the responsible hand of humanity in culling off the 'sickly'.  Though in reality anything of detestable sickly green is a matter of perspective, one should imagine, and a respective culture lensing the attributes of the 'sickly'.  A rare moment is given to the notion, 'They cull our populations to keep our numbers in check relative to theirs' which speaks of a more likely truth in the matter of R/K selection, and as to 'useful idiocy' at present, for instance, has taken upon racialized 'white minority' Presidential election campaigning.  Though supposedly tonality has all changed for this.  As to selection theory, I thought the issue of combinatorics and genetics far more complex than as given by merely as singular switching as found in one specific gene controlling one and only one function.  'Useful Idiocy', however, relates most heavily to simplified models of anything and/or artificiality therein and sets about plaguing the world with its offspring.  Not withstanding that wuff apparently suffers from K Selection based genetic disorders for all apparent 'human' usefulness and for that matter a class of humanity in 'pure' breeding.