Covered chapter 19.3 from Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers, Hamming.
If having followed the previous post,
which introduced the formulation by way of sample points as
parameters technique, one will now have some understanding with
respect to the ideas presented on this next topic. The ideas are
really the same except generalized a bit more. Prerequisites here
are also the same. There will be use of series summations included
in this topic. As a refresher to series summation, I'd present the
following series here and define a sequence alongside this.
Firstly, let's consider a simple
sequence like
a = {1, 2, 3, 4 , 5, 6, 7}
Here the series of a is written
or we can also express sequence of a as
where the sequence {ai}is written
Now introducing Gauss quadrature integration. Let
N points exist such that
where both the weights and the sample
points are regarded as parameters.
For all wk and
xk we have a total of N wk
xk terms which means there are N+N = 2N
parameters in total.
The defining equations in this case
like the previous example posting are generalized with 2N defining
equations:
As in the previous posting we use a
polynomial only it is composed of N factors as opposed to 2 meaning
this is a polynomial of Nth degree
Remember before when we had a
polynomial of 2nd degree, we had 2 coefficients c0
and c1, in this case we have N coefficients
c0, c1, …,
cN-1. Notice the sequence case pattern here?
Procedurally we'd do much the same as
we did in the previous postings which were to multiply each of the N
coefficients c0, c1, …,
cN-1 respectively times each of the defining
equations above, or in the generalized form, we multiply the j th
equations by cj and sum these equations which
takes the form
noting here that xk
is a factor (or zero) in the polynomial π (x) and zeros the
polynomial.
In the previous posting it were more
or less demonstrated that the added cj
multiplied mjth equations plus mN
th equations would lead to grouping of terms leading to a given
wk π(xk) series. See
the previous posting example for the case N = 2. As it turns out the
same as generally true for all cases of N.
Procedurally like the previous posting,
we shift the multipliers cj down one line and
repeat the process to get
Thus we have 2 equations of this form
so far. We need a total of N equations of this form so we repeat the
process of shifting our multipliers down to the k th case so that
which results in N total equations of this form. Where the final
equation in such equation generating sequence is
At the moment, will for go providing an
example here, but it suffices to say we can use the same methods
found solving the set of N linear equations for all coefficients
c0, c1, …,
cN-1. You could apply solution techniques
found in linear algebra to accomplish this. Once having coefficients for the given N the degree polynomial one would have to determine factorization here. Fortunately, there are methods for doing this, but this extends beyond typical high school and college algebra. Here is a link to some factorization techniques however. Probably wise to have a computer or computational aids to do much of this since much of this may require number crunching and extends beyond what one might want to do by hand in this case of higher degree polynomials. Having this, we then
reapply the same techniques to solve the the N generated equations
for our given weights w0, w1,
…, wN-1.
Also we can apply this form of integration with respect to any function f(x). Here we did so where f(x) = 1.
No comments:
Post a Comment