When there is much else it seems going on in this world...
Priorities come by way of the dangers supposedly posed by any one thing in life, rational or irrational fear supposedly is made of this, truth comes by the rational nature of people that scale anything where inherent dangers abound and are called sane, while those that remain in too much supposedly the coveted state of protection are called dangers to themselves and others. The suspect causus belli is one driven for other reasons, if for the sake of perceived power alone. If a career is driven in some way in part by a given professional sanctuary given to those in saying whatever should be pleased in some way shape or form by the industries, governments themselves, which invoke the insanity of imagination, it is this sort of sanctuary that is endowed to the privilege of a few, all else considered in another way suspect.
Typical response testing might fall short in any event, and likely it seems in the long run, one were to ask, much here should fall short of assimilating, reintegrating, providing social welfare to other for their benefit, but merely having engaged in risk measurement and potentially any punitive means in liabilities assessment. Only the threshold bar declines in some manner, and with threshold diminishing it seems it would take a long time before the fitness test should formally preclude legislation which explicitly made clear the mentally fit should even have an eligible vote in a given state, as if the contingency of a state's deterioration resided on the presence of insanity destroying state and government alike. Of course, it is easy to hold suspect and target marginal peoples in society. Social systems and economics it seems should provide some fluid easing to the notion that when changes are supposedly to be made in a society the conditions warranting were likely for all the reasons that have changes occurring where resistances are least, the marginal are easier to wrought, transform, assimilate, destroy, demolish in changing, while on the other hand, requiring the mainstream to change is another matter, it obviously costs more, for instance, changing wholesale fleets of gas driven cars with electric ones, and thus the great leap in changing the culture of societies is often times not really given to the changes one might expect. On the matter of the supposed rise of regression, on the other hand, it seems at all likely, that razing bouts, last in short orders of time, and then pass with respect to general social trending.
When others claim to have interests but really don't, or when it becomes more than abundantly obvious otherwise, one sees the world not as in a system devised of social welfare, mechanisms of social control can at times be devised in these forms of aid, the much given to excessive complainer fills the bed and although there really relative to other things passing in this world, be so much of a tangible threat there is something of a quota filled by these sorts of observations. Sensitivity and tolerances, neither come so much by the systemic conditions given to any generation raised to the degree of having likely successes, these sorts of support networks are often times given to the construct that hard times are given to easier passage, recovery is given to a phone call of support, or friend at the doorstep, the 'I heard you were out of work, so I passed this message on to a friend...' while the marginalized often times have none of these advantages. Of course, in polite terms academia focuses on inherent social structures as a causal or providing relation while major cities merely engage in risk containment strategies, and only with a pulpit whip that offers on the other side of less than affable doublespeak. Here social welfare systems fail us when the same mega power house financial institutions rob us blind in some manner, and it is social welfare that is to serve as lynch pin of the ills for a given society?! It seems in another way, that we could be ignorant enough to allow ourselves to be doubly robbed in society?!
Test baiting and negative stimuli?! Come on' it seems a fascist society could do better than this?!
Priorities come by way of the dangers supposedly posed by any one thing in life, rational or irrational fear supposedly is made of this, truth comes by the rational nature of people that scale anything where inherent dangers abound and are called sane, while those that remain in too much supposedly the coveted state of protection are called dangers to themselves and others. The suspect causus belli is one driven for other reasons, if for the sake of perceived power alone. If a career is driven in some way in part by a given professional sanctuary given to those in saying whatever should be pleased in some way shape or form by the industries, governments themselves, which invoke the insanity of imagination, it is this sort of sanctuary that is endowed to the privilege of a few, all else considered in another way suspect.
Typical response testing might fall short in any event, and likely it seems in the long run, one were to ask, much here should fall short of assimilating, reintegrating, providing social welfare to other for their benefit, but merely having engaged in risk measurement and potentially any punitive means in liabilities assessment. Only the threshold bar declines in some manner, and with threshold diminishing it seems it would take a long time before the fitness test should formally preclude legislation which explicitly made clear the mentally fit should even have an eligible vote in a given state, as if the contingency of a state's deterioration resided on the presence of insanity destroying state and government alike. Of course, it is easy to hold suspect and target marginal peoples in society. Social systems and economics it seems should provide some fluid easing to the notion that when changes are supposedly to be made in a society the conditions warranting were likely for all the reasons that have changes occurring where resistances are least, the marginal are easier to wrought, transform, assimilate, destroy, demolish in changing, while on the other hand, requiring the mainstream to change is another matter, it obviously costs more, for instance, changing wholesale fleets of gas driven cars with electric ones, and thus the great leap in changing the culture of societies is often times not really given to the changes one might expect. On the matter of the supposed rise of regression, on the other hand, it seems at all likely, that razing bouts, last in short orders of time, and then pass with respect to general social trending.
When others claim to have interests but really don't, or when it becomes more than abundantly obvious otherwise, one sees the world not as in a system devised of social welfare, mechanisms of social control can at times be devised in these forms of aid, the much given to excessive complainer fills the bed and although there really relative to other things passing in this world, be so much of a tangible threat there is something of a quota filled by these sorts of observations. Sensitivity and tolerances, neither come so much by the systemic conditions given to any generation raised to the degree of having likely successes, these sorts of support networks are often times given to the construct that hard times are given to easier passage, recovery is given to a phone call of support, or friend at the doorstep, the 'I heard you were out of work, so I passed this message on to a friend...' while the marginalized often times have none of these advantages. Of course, in polite terms academia focuses on inherent social structures as a causal or providing relation while major cities merely engage in risk containment strategies, and only with a pulpit whip that offers on the other side of less than affable doublespeak. Here social welfare systems fail us when the same mega power house financial institutions rob us blind in some manner, and it is social welfare that is to serve as lynch pin of the ills for a given society?! It seems in another way, that we could be ignorant enough to allow ourselves to be doubly robbed in society?!
Test baiting and negative stimuli?! Come on' it seems a fascist society could do better than this?!
No comments:
Post a Comment