Often it seems in recent times as should be the case one should wonder in the past, much given popular discourse on particular faith bearing views, or as one might suspect were suggestively a way of homogenizing a political field in so far as alignments. In this spatial duality, there are common sensed and well reasoned atheists and on a given opposite camp, child like individuals lacking sense and reason, often given to propensity of violence, or at that aimed at controlling the civil discord of society. Of course, this makes easier for the semblance and structure of a given social world, or where antagonisms are drawn, this hearkens to the great divisions once given between believer and non believer, one given to heaven and the other hell where stark fear ridden contrast having led to the perilous journey of a life. Meanwhile, animals exist presumably (even in suffering as to the causation of some downfall) in suffering, but technically never really committed to such a sin as in violation of the order of life which were created in so far as inherent nature. Man in this case cost so much more to the earthly existence than himself alone, at least, companions in suffering would do so as life one could tell were comprised of such reality. No doubt for the skeptical it seems an inquiry into the nature of human institutions, simultaneously become popular drivers for faith reformation. In this past, this may have less likely taken the form of 'faith' thrown completely out the door, but merely that institutional or human fallibility were culprits with respect to such orders. Although in the rise of 'modern' beliefs (where skeptical thought in some ways may have flourished in classical antiquity), the old culprits of fallibility and the otherwise apparently seen worldly views of history provide fuel for doubt and reason, or at least 'Why should God not correct the false hoods perpetuated by man?' Why should believe in anything if institutions themselves should be susceptible to the degree of not providing truth where it is most obvious that any truth went against some institutional authority on subject matters? Wholly the problem relating to faith and institution at times should seem synonymous, in such a way that for those outside of a given faith clergy, lay, and religious authority should seem highly integrated perhaps, when the truth of the matter of faith, is that variance in beliefs exist even between hierarchy and lower echelons of clergy, but even given the framework of larger institutions the same could at times be true for those in various denominations. Even while something of push and impetus to politically and socially align people, for instance, in the name of some new military industrial 'not really having much to do with religion at all' cultural zeal, it seems something of personal faith enters into the matter of any given belief system, and here to something of alignment between supposed 'non believers' that for all practical purposes millions of miles from a given culture. Often what is seen could be measured in the sense of a world that is given in much similar reverberating delineation that hearken to old world duality of heaven and hell. "Why don't they understand us well enough, for instance, when we haven't dropped enough bombs apparently as of yet?" The so called 'moderates' of another world claim that the primal nature of old world faith has yet arisen...decry to re institute the head dress much to liking of western powers, only it should be more obvious that supposedly religious conservatism and a given innate backwardness of a given people has re arisen, and much to the world that lives behind the walled compound (in a post apartheid society) or cloister, this seems to resonate...where the old glorious days of empire breathe life into new spiritual conquests. Much of this, however, could as in the case of fallibility be given to the institutions of man and those serving to re perpetuate the necessity of existential claims. Here to be a doubter and naysayer, then begs question in such times as to the nature of allegiance, or profits the mode of what is wrong in society.
Long ago I spoke and would continue to speak out against teaching of something like 'creationism' in the classroom, yet I generally hold some religious view, and even if inferred in some way sharing an opinion likewise regarding this as a personal matter of faith. I am generally not hostile with respect to those of differing faith, or at least apparently in some directed manner, I sense in modern times as is the trend neither hostile enough, mostly given to the chord of indifference in so far as 'islamo fascist' preachings...of which often strikes in recent years as promoting nothing more than servile outright disgraceful unquestioning attitudes, mostly because representation apparently couldn't be more at times democratically lacking. Of course, I offer that the simplistic portraits given between those who choose to believe one way over another, are nothing short of bad propaganda, or for that matter if you might have been better served watching 'Reefer Madness' to understand the dangers and perils of drug use or why the war on drugs at times couldn't have struck as being so obviously phony and contrived...mostly though it is as if there weren't an underlying and obvious dishonesty given with respect to the creation of the 'straw men' in such a world. No less convenient that supposedly in such a day, the village beating should for the better service of a fascist nation and/or world governments contriving to pit themselves into a new modern world order that strive to make people believe in the primacy of a cause again.
I think instead I am led to an even deeper skepticism concerning governmental institutional authority, more so then with the concern on the matter of Gods existence or no existence, where the displacement of accountable safe guards might have been displaced for the sake of security rule and the great compromise of civil rights on the part of its citizenry is for the sake of so little extremist violence, or much as to the arguments offered by the west in its self supporting propaganda in regarding the east, the tap is fed ever so much in the right the way for self sustenance. If ever so much doubt is directed with respect to faith in belief systems by goodness, isn't this related to something of worldly matters?! I think spending so much time on the ideological precipice of faith in the abstract sense misleads much to the issue of how social relation is given and drawn elsewhere, it is often excused and given to the exercise of power. The resulting world seems nothing more than an artificial synthesis of supposedly natural derivation but having the manifestation of one seeming 'control' group relative another. Having something to oppose...that plays how into human nature by evolution and human psychology?
Long ago I spoke and would continue to speak out against teaching of something like 'creationism' in the classroom, yet I generally hold some religious view, and even if inferred in some way sharing an opinion likewise regarding this as a personal matter of faith. I am generally not hostile with respect to those of differing faith, or at least apparently in some directed manner, I sense in modern times as is the trend neither hostile enough, mostly given to the chord of indifference in so far as 'islamo fascist' preachings...of which often strikes in recent years as promoting nothing more than servile outright disgraceful unquestioning attitudes, mostly because representation apparently couldn't be more at times democratically lacking. Of course, I offer that the simplistic portraits given between those who choose to believe one way over another, are nothing short of bad propaganda, or for that matter if you might have been better served watching 'Reefer Madness' to understand the dangers and perils of drug use or why the war on drugs at times couldn't have struck as being so obviously phony and contrived...mostly though it is as if there weren't an underlying and obvious dishonesty given with respect to the creation of the 'straw men' in such a world. No less convenient that supposedly in such a day, the village beating should for the better service of a fascist nation and/or world governments contriving to pit themselves into a new modern world order that strive to make people believe in the primacy of a cause again.
I think instead I am led to an even deeper skepticism concerning governmental institutional authority, more so then with the concern on the matter of Gods existence or no existence, where the displacement of accountable safe guards might have been displaced for the sake of security rule and the great compromise of civil rights on the part of its citizenry is for the sake of so little extremist violence, or much as to the arguments offered by the west in its self supporting propaganda in regarding the east, the tap is fed ever so much in the right the way for self sustenance. If ever so much doubt is directed with respect to faith in belief systems by goodness, isn't this related to something of worldly matters?! I think spending so much time on the ideological precipice of faith in the abstract sense misleads much to the issue of how social relation is given and drawn elsewhere, it is often excused and given to the exercise of power. The resulting world seems nothing more than an artificial synthesis of supposedly natural derivation but having the manifestation of one seeming 'control' group relative another. Having something to oppose...that plays how into human nature by evolution and human psychology?
No comments:
Post a Comment