Or so it would seem the campaign to convert people over to a well used technology that may not actually represent the best service for a given consumer, but why so?
Well as you might believe, given that we, for instance, in commercial aviation planes use GPS technology which itself were given from satellite technology, that consumer commercial satellite technology more commonly used in broadcast should be a great deal for consumers, and as it stands similarly the same might have been said for satellite cellular communications service. As it turns out in the later case, apparently poorer infrastructures investment coupled to the rapidity of technological advance and then also relating, for instance, others like orbital insertion of a given satellite payload followed by limited lifetime of a given satellite, for instance, had proved more costly in the wireless communications model relative to ground based distributed infrastructure which proved to be the predominant model for wireless communications in general. As it turns out while cable providers, in part might receive recorded broadcasts still via commercial satellite technology in this day, on the other hand, it would appear the vast consumer subscriber base for television services are actually in cable, and likely in the future, one should imagine both ground based wireless and wired services as the predominant infrastructural model. As it turns out, despite, for instance, Direct Televisions advertising campaigns, arguably the industry has suffered in consumer subscription losses where despite campaigns made touting cutting edge consumer subscription service, actually could be speaking to lack luster consumer incentives in terms of subscription, and maybe this could be owing to the more problematic aspects of satellite technology and actually upgrading this in general. If it is more expensive to put up new technology in the sky relative to ground based deployment costs, it seems satellite technology could be at some disadvantage relative to other consumer subscription service types. As to commercial's attempting to make unfair comparisons in a given market place, it seems there could be likely as much deception involved. Where poor decision making reigns it seems, isn't merely given for instance, by choice of food alone, but it seems the state of California suffers from this inherent problem, a state that Rob Lowe by choice in either duplicitous form occupies in so far as the greater food production problem.
Update:
Apparently, Rob Lowe ads have been slated for the pulling, yet claiming effectiveness (personally I highly doubt such claims). Then Rob Lowe claims as much being the 'subversive', or merely classically resorting to at times cultural biases, stereotypes or anything that other 'subversives' might have spent centuries in fighting against.
Well as you might believe, given that we, for instance, in commercial aviation planes use GPS technology which itself were given from satellite technology, that consumer commercial satellite technology more commonly used in broadcast should be a great deal for consumers, and as it stands similarly the same might have been said for satellite cellular communications service. As it turns out in the later case, apparently poorer infrastructures investment coupled to the rapidity of technological advance and then also relating, for instance, others like orbital insertion of a given satellite payload followed by limited lifetime of a given satellite, for instance, had proved more costly in the wireless communications model relative to ground based distributed infrastructure which proved to be the predominant model for wireless communications in general. As it turns out while cable providers, in part might receive recorded broadcasts still via commercial satellite technology in this day, on the other hand, it would appear the vast consumer subscriber base for television services are actually in cable, and likely in the future, one should imagine both ground based wireless and wired services as the predominant infrastructural model. As it turns out, despite, for instance, Direct Televisions advertising campaigns, arguably the industry has suffered in consumer subscription losses where despite campaigns made touting cutting edge consumer subscription service, actually could be speaking to lack luster consumer incentives in terms of subscription, and maybe this could be owing to the more problematic aspects of satellite technology and actually upgrading this in general. If it is more expensive to put up new technology in the sky relative to ground based deployment costs, it seems satellite technology could be at some disadvantage relative to other consumer subscription service types. As to commercial's attempting to make unfair comparisons in a given market place, it seems there could be likely as much deception involved. Where poor decision making reigns it seems, isn't merely given for instance, by choice of food alone, but it seems the state of California suffers from this inherent problem, a state that Rob Lowe by choice in either duplicitous form occupies in so far as the greater food production problem.
Update:
Apparently, Rob Lowe ads have been slated for the pulling, yet claiming effectiveness (personally I highly doubt such claims). Then Rob Lowe claims as much being the 'subversive', or merely classically resorting to at times cultural biases, stereotypes or anything that other 'subversives' might have spent centuries in fighting against.
No comments:
Post a Comment