If adequately holed up in the house for periods of years (we'll being running on a ten years in another two years), you can survive! Sadly, unlike the sorts of social confrontations that might normally play out, its more as Pink Floyd apparently died much with a previous generation awhile ago while in perpetuation of the 'leaf' from another harvest.
Living in the limbo of test world, or test subject, or more happenstance, because social and political policies were always changing. This sort of accounting for why on a given day, measured anti social hostilities rise and fall.
And honestly in a large democracy, you might have expected nothing more of name presence. If you talked of an American dissident such as Bobby Fischer, most would say 'Who?' This represents or at least seems to represent the truth of any American knowledge regarding the myth of its own existence, or in other words 'What made America so successful in the first place at providing little space in representing those whom might have been marginalized, served wrongly in history?' There could be buzz words in the space of Tuskegee, but did you know the names of those victimized wrongfully? Or in this regard that Tuskegee actually extended beyond Tuskegee, that were actually other people and places effected by a more generalized social policy? If it should seem only isolated in mind with respect to the course of history, is this not often times the course of social presentations often times found. The nature of vocal ism changes itself, if only Chomsky or Zinn were most actively prominent in buzz circles at the heights of certain administration, otherwise, more muted could one say clearly, how one's experience were any better or any worse in these days?! Certainly, there would be a large percentage of any others whom hadn't shared directly in one's experience alone, and this in a way could be the centerpiece of how social policies play out more clearly. If it weren't based as it were allowed by the tolerances of populous as a whole, only more pervasive selection on the side of margins. Wide spread dissent at times could be rarer these days, or where at least it might have been akin to the traditional mainstays of obvious physical presence, only electronic dissent, evoking in mind something of a distrust concerning the matter of reach. I am left wondering what happened to the springs of a few years back here. What happened to this generation of people?! Did they abandon their causes? Did they find more actively work in non profit or any profitable causes aiding people on the whole regarding concerns of economic and social nature? It seems if anything something might have been short lived, and in Kansas City, my nearest sojourn nearest in proximity were as a passenger waiting only for the conclusion of where about information of a nearest CSA cooperative (incidentally I might not have seen this very muted rally if hadn't been nearest a Costco which weren't so far then from Liberty memorial). It were colder that day, and more likely groups of people were huddled in tents, if they hadn't appeared closest to a cook, roasting something like hot dogs. Their numbers could hardly be described in millions, hundreds of thousands, thousands, or even hundreds, more like a small handful. In retrospect, often times media portrayals in some circles that might have likened this movement to thugs, rapist, and looters (whose relative social margins) could hardly describe a center whole in so far as complete descriptions, but how much impact and change really amounted here? Hadn't clear enough contrast existed?
And as to today?! Today, it seems relative any given day having existed a year or several years past, if only increased social belligerence weren't on the rise in some manner, a context of present politic conditions should seem proximate enough. One's perspective being limited enough, I had shut down some social networking accounts a few months ago, and maybe it were the better course, given so much of the information gathering that were available. Facebook, I had recently, only made it more difficult to keep postings private (not sure of this present status), and generally as far as e hostilities were concerned, and long enough in running, our civilization is now able to make the scarlet letter true of any for potentially an electronic lifetime...shouldn't this be our modern cause of social ill? Are we that out of touch with any moral pulse that might have existed?!
Living in the limbo of test world, or test subject, or more happenstance, because social and political policies were always changing. This sort of accounting for why on a given day, measured anti social hostilities rise and fall.
And honestly in a large democracy, you might have expected nothing more of name presence. If you talked of an American dissident such as Bobby Fischer, most would say 'Who?' This represents or at least seems to represent the truth of any American knowledge regarding the myth of its own existence, or in other words 'What made America so successful in the first place at providing little space in representing those whom might have been marginalized, served wrongly in history?' There could be buzz words in the space of Tuskegee, but did you know the names of those victimized wrongfully? Or in this regard that Tuskegee actually extended beyond Tuskegee, that were actually other people and places effected by a more generalized social policy? If it should seem only isolated in mind with respect to the course of history, is this not often times the course of social presentations often times found. The nature of vocal ism changes itself, if only Chomsky or Zinn were most actively prominent in buzz circles at the heights of certain administration, otherwise, more muted could one say clearly, how one's experience were any better or any worse in these days?! Certainly, there would be a large percentage of any others whom hadn't shared directly in one's experience alone, and this in a way could be the centerpiece of how social policies play out more clearly. If it weren't based as it were allowed by the tolerances of populous as a whole, only more pervasive selection on the side of margins. Wide spread dissent at times could be rarer these days, or where at least it might have been akin to the traditional mainstays of obvious physical presence, only electronic dissent, evoking in mind something of a distrust concerning the matter of reach. I am left wondering what happened to the springs of a few years back here. What happened to this generation of people?! Did they abandon their causes? Did they find more actively work in non profit or any profitable causes aiding people on the whole regarding concerns of economic and social nature? It seems if anything something might have been short lived, and in Kansas City, my nearest sojourn nearest in proximity were as a passenger waiting only for the conclusion of where about information of a nearest CSA cooperative (incidentally I might not have seen this very muted rally if hadn't been nearest a Costco which weren't so far then from Liberty memorial). It were colder that day, and more likely groups of people were huddled in tents, if they hadn't appeared closest to a cook, roasting something like hot dogs. Their numbers could hardly be described in millions, hundreds of thousands, thousands, or even hundreds, more like a small handful. In retrospect, often times media portrayals in some circles that might have likened this movement to thugs, rapist, and looters (whose relative social margins) could hardly describe a center whole in so far as complete descriptions, but how much impact and change really amounted here? Hadn't clear enough contrast existed?
And as to today?! Today, it seems relative any given day having existed a year or several years past, if only increased social belligerence weren't on the rise in some manner, a context of present politic conditions should seem proximate enough. One's perspective being limited enough, I had shut down some social networking accounts a few months ago, and maybe it were the better course, given so much of the information gathering that were available. Facebook, I had recently, only made it more difficult to keep postings private (not sure of this present status), and generally as far as e hostilities were concerned, and long enough in running, our civilization is now able to make the scarlet letter true of any for potentially an electronic lifetime...shouldn't this be our modern cause of social ill? Are we that out of touch with any moral pulse that might have existed?!
I incidentally have tried picking up some autumn reading again, Henry James's Turn of the Screw, and watching a Bela Lugosi collection. I am not sure what I may do next otherwise.
Sure run a car with a license plate that says little more then what it states except hinting at some fundamentally held and insistent belief never stating any clear reasons why, sure that's the way many propagandists operate and have operated for sometime, preaching like to self serving choirs. Only with deeper inset faith and views to fundamental truths holding in principle concerning the non transient nature of universal justice, how far does a licence plate moniker go?! Trying to screw people over for lies only goes so far...
For all these years of unwarranted social harassment wouldn't anyone want to know why?! Granted on and off, its as if there were something true fundamentally regarding the arbitrary nature of states at times in so far as the condition of one's living existence (what is right in one day seems to be a relative no no on another day), granted one weren't experiencing the literally relativity of time itself as much, and maybe that's a conditional improvement?!
Typically speaking, there isn't much of huge substance, one would imagine, in writing more of daily activities here, in that they were much the same relative a past. If a day might seem framed with some implicit communications on a given point, never are clearer charges presented on anything really, and that is if a given point could be more clearly made, noting often times if it could generally best be made outside the boundaries of home and electronic territories. These seem in a way more like the sorts of social orchestrations of one sort or another...a lapse in clearer activity for months seemingly providing headway here, or leaving a certain sense of the matter in mind as often coming and going as it were like the seasons themselves, neither leaving impacting and significant note. Minding if one is this role could be adequately served to the role Weather underground, so in passing, resolutions regarding budgetary impasses are in evidence being reached...as to who winners and losers are blowing wind, remains to be seen and especially with respect to social orchestrations...hmm, the underground doesn't seem to make any more headway relative to any other days before.
If you wanted to know or really cared, I'm generally much the moderate about anything political these days.
Generally speaking if this sounded like long winded approach to people bashing, I'd offer maybe outside of statistical information (for proof) that people aren't so bad, but this hadn't meant that there weren't those with ill purpose. Its usually a minority population that apparently bothers to care so much to the extent of malign purpose sometimes to greater ambivalence of a given population of people. While it should seem the nature of people in these population subsets statistically fluctuate for any number of reasons, its still a concern regarding the matter of privacy (or information phishing) on the part of a given small minority that use it for less the good purposes. Not sure if facebook reneged on the removal of that keep your postings private for shares options, but one would still hope they reconsidered?!
Sure run a car with a license plate that says little more then what it states except hinting at some fundamentally held and insistent belief never stating any clear reasons why, sure that's the way many propagandists operate and have operated for sometime, preaching like to self serving choirs. Only with deeper inset faith and views to fundamental truths holding in principle concerning the non transient nature of universal justice, how far does a licence plate moniker go?! Trying to screw people over for lies only goes so far...
For all these years of unwarranted social harassment wouldn't anyone want to know why?! Granted on and off, its as if there were something true fundamentally regarding the arbitrary nature of states at times in so far as the condition of one's living existence (what is right in one day seems to be a relative no no on another day), granted one weren't experiencing the literally relativity of time itself as much, and maybe that's a conditional improvement?!
Typically speaking, there isn't much of huge substance, one would imagine, in writing more of daily activities here, in that they were much the same relative a past. If a day might seem framed with some implicit communications on a given point, never are clearer charges presented on anything really, and that is if a given point could be more clearly made, noting often times if it could generally best be made outside the boundaries of home and electronic territories. These seem in a way more like the sorts of social orchestrations of one sort or another...a lapse in clearer activity for months seemingly providing headway here, or leaving a certain sense of the matter in mind as often coming and going as it were like the seasons themselves, neither leaving impacting and significant note. Minding if one is this role could be adequately served to the role Weather underground, so in passing, resolutions regarding budgetary impasses are in evidence being reached...as to who winners and losers are blowing wind, remains to be seen and especially with respect to social orchestrations...hmm, the underground doesn't seem to make any more headway relative to any other days before.
If you wanted to know or really cared, I'm generally much the moderate about anything political these days.
Generally speaking if this sounded like long winded approach to people bashing, I'd offer maybe outside of statistical information (for proof) that people aren't so bad, but this hadn't meant that there weren't those with ill purpose. Its usually a minority population that apparently bothers to care so much to the extent of malign purpose sometimes to greater ambivalence of a given population of people. While it should seem the nature of people in these population subsets statistically fluctuate for any number of reasons, its still a concern regarding the matter of privacy (or information phishing) on the part of a given small minority that use it for less the good purposes. Not sure if facebook reneged on the removal of that keep your postings private for shares options, but one would still hope they reconsidered?!
No comments:
Post a Comment