I am wondering about this condition, namely: there is an often invisible force that is all about each and every human that broadcasts something.... I mean this on a put of humor, so don't assume I am necessarily being serious here, offering honesty. This invisible force is given by charismatic appearance, but also this condition of the physical archetype which we relate to most. It is the same archetype, for instance, that infers one's likely affinity or repulsion to another. Clearly the mechanism must have something greater? Is it invisible? Is it by nature of how many times one blinks, or I am sure there is something else by this? Maybe, if it at first glance, it is that someone is immediately relate able in some way as though by some common cultural verse. Verbosity doesn't help? Text is losing relation to future media, or that one is being judged by socially networked stills, the sort indicating all of one's surroundings. Friends, or otherwise. A possible class of social function embedded. All the sharing of the visual facet of the mind, moves to higher action. A mobile person. The photos seem the same. The same faces maybe? Don't they. The same situations.
Soon, there should be 'cultural genre' given to all this which aids in the self curation of one's visually social networking presentation. "Emo" yesterday, "Hipster" today. Friends in these genre categories receive the desired instagram photos of one's genre choosing. Seems good to me. :)
Soon, there should be 'cultural genre' given to all this which aids in the self curation of one's visually social networking presentation. "Emo" yesterday, "Hipster" today. Friends in these genre categories receive the desired instagram photos of one's genre choosing. Seems good to me. :)
No comments:
Post a Comment