Does it matter in saying?!
Exploitative industrial systems generally don't go about the process of hiding or concealing much at any given time...at least something of my own personal theory. If only to portray if ever so briefly there are signs at increased hesitance in the perpetuation of a given system's role, but often it seems these could be nothing more then versed orchestrations that came from within their own ranks...consider the operative sent in the case of the movie ('Promised Land') sent actually by a given gas production industry to orchestrate and direct the voice of an opposition only to sabotage it for the purpose of winning over contract rights, or if ever there were a phrase about winning and losing, the industrialist plays with whomever is winning regardless, and that means if they have lost, that they simply buy out the winners for the right price likewise. Pretty insidious isn't it?! These sorts of exploitative industrialists, pretend often times one should wonder, or scarcely seem to acknowledge what they do know if they happen to know what is there, as in the case of something like coltan production, maybe industrialists on one side of the pond have some understanding, but they don't care, only if they hadn't all the information at their disposal concerning materials/resource exploitation, they don't care, because agreements and negotiations were reached on the basis of a system that were put in place by an entire system as complexly arranged for the purposes of simply providing a marketplace (no questions asked) for resources, could they exactly be the operators that were systematically killing as in genocide millions of people over time to gain access in the clearest sense of the word?
Were it the responsibility of others, for instance, some securities group that aided the training and operations of neighboring countries in sabotaging things like security, leading to a civil war, the sorts of societal disruptions that makes indigenous governance over resources difficult enough so that the outcomes were moving more towards the circumstance of pillaging and looting?! Obviously, the art of a pillaging economy is such that if the work done for the effort gains much more relative to a traded monetary exchange, means that pillaging and looting potentially does pay off dividends, and especially in the way that lesser checks on accountability are provided for in terms of diplomacy or anything else, one should wonder why it weren't more prolific in another way?! Obviously it seems harder to imagine, taking so many steps backwards, for a given population that in effect were enjoying something of fruits itself should subject itself to the sort of lawlessness that it would have of its neighbors. Here you are thinking surely that we have prided ourselves when the nominal and token gestures of tears are given, a man cries and weeps about the state of the world, and then in another photo is seated alongside the equivalent of Hitler and praising him no doubt, speaks volumes doesn't it?!
I don't see defenders these days speaking so much of counter propaganda, but only seem to resolve themselves at times alluding to bygone eras when 'Monroe Doctrine' applications were in full sway...of course, the parents were right to send their children of these places likely to the hands of an enemy indirectly responsible for orchestrating the sorts of high levels of crime and problems found back in that home. Here, at least, for most of American's likely one should imagine in the dark with respect to the recesses of problems created abroad, they'd shed some visibly sympathetic eye?!
America is probably right to be influentially in decline in South America (and good that it is that way), and hopefully it stays that way, and continues on the same path of decline in sickly bullying and exploiting the rest of the world.
Exploitative industrial systems generally don't go about the process of hiding or concealing much at any given time...at least something of my own personal theory. If only to portray if ever so briefly there are signs at increased hesitance in the perpetuation of a given system's role, but often it seems these could be nothing more then versed orchestrations that came from within their own ranks...consider the operative sent in the case of the movie ('Promised Land') sent actually by a given gas production industry to orchestrate and direct the voice of an opposition only to sabotage it for the purpose of winning over contract rights, or if ever there were a phrase about winning and losing, the industrialist plays with whomever is winning regardless, and that means if they have lost, that they simply buy out the winners for the right price likewise. Pretty insidious isn't it?! These sorts of exploitative industrialists, pretend often times one should wonder, or scarcely seem to acknowledge what they do know if they happen to know what is there, as in the case of something like coltan production, maybe industrialists on one side of the pond have some understanding, but they don't care, only if they hadn't all the information at their disposal concerning materials/resource exploitation, they don't care, because agreements and negotiations were reached on the basis of a system that were put in place by an entire system as complexly arranged for the purposes of simply providing a marketplace (no questions asked) for resources, could they exactly be the operators that were systematically killing as in genocide millions of people over time to gain access in the clearest sense of the word?
Were it the responsibility of others, for instance, some securities group that aided the training and operations of neighboring countries in sabotaging things like security, leading to a civil war, the sorts of societal disruptions that makes indigenous governance over resources difficult enough so that the outcomes were moving more towards the circumstance of pillaging and looting?! Obviously, the art of a pillaging economy is such that if the work done for the effort gains much more relative to a traded monetary exchange, means that pillaging and looting potentially does pay off dividends, and especially in the way that lesser checks on accountability are provided for in terms of diplomacy or anything else, one should wonder why it weren't more prolific in another way?! Obviously it seems harder to imagine, taking so many steps backwards, for a given population that in effect were enjoying something of fruits itself should subject itself to the sort of lawlessness that it would have of its neighbors. Here you are thinking surely that we have prided ourselves when the nominal and token gestures of tears are given, a man cries and weeps about the state of the world, and then in another photo is seated alongside the equivalent of Hitler and praising him no doubt, speaks volumes doesn't it?!
I don't see defenders these days speaking so much of counter propaganda, but only seem to resolve themselves at times alluding to bygone eras when 'Monroe Doctrine' applications were in full sway...of course, the parents were right to send their children of these places likely to the hands of an enemy indirectly responsible for orchestrating the sorts of high levels of crime and problems found back in that home. Here, at least, for most of American's likely one should imagine in the dark with respect to the recesses of problems created abroad, they'd shed some visibly sympathetic eye?!
America is probably right to be influentially in decline in South America (and good that it is that way), and hopefully it stays that way, and continues on the same path of decline in sickly bullying and exploiting the rest of the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment