Let's see under any given number of hypothetical s where:
All along for years, you've apparently dealt with any number of circumstances that should be one of the same, conspiracies regenerate, cover ups ensue. Life is supposed to continue, history books aren't written correctly, or at least are inherently biased in perspective or sweeping sets of omissions.
On the one hand, rule of law and order, on the other hand, nothing of this truly exists, or this sort of formalism at least is merely the obstacle and hurdle in achieving any objective. But why important? Well, it seems more obvious in perspective, that if you wanted your neighbors land, it would be easier for outright 'cold blooded' seizure of property, or that if you wanted to dispense with political, never mind innocence, aims are easier to achieve, if they were 'sub human'. At least more obviously you run the transition between formally working 'evidence' for the sham to working more so the sham where it is more boldly obvious.
Where to go when its merely the repetition of a given number of events that seem to re surface from a given past, in fact, it seems more likely one should reason, no where to go. Conjecture here entails, more broadly a given divide runs more sharply along 'cold war' like divisions. Where it truly safer to be in Canada?
The flour bugs return, let's say after a cycle of a few years, you had been conditioned by way of conditioning here, abdominal cramping, fatigue, seemingly not healing right, and so forth on the order of months...you learn to stop cooking much, and do short order shopping, only because you reason on a basic level, that increased frequency of home invasions could lead to greater potential chance of intercept if all in theory were potentially as one possibly suspected but never fully knew. It seems if its high order scandal here the usual course is massive cover up(?), or at least veneered pretense and sham of saying anything defensible otherwise. At least when the flour bugs return, you reason maybe a little more likely safe. All along through one cycles lull to the next height though you seem steadfastly more conditioned to the wave, the wave moves on, and you are left managing 'life' which hardly seems right, and provides little consolations in some ways. At least you reason, you must have been sufficiently in the 'magic cave' to survive this one, and your prayers must have meant something, or at least, then you are conditioned all along either to believe you were imagining anything of that were thought (as in the great shutter island metropolis that would convince anyone they were truly crazy), and here even conditioning runs along the lines 'cold blooded and pathological', it is all thought right in this manner giving industries much pathological flexibility so as to allow for flawed engine switches, and so to potentially much more, if so many more were to walk in step with one another into some greater unseen abyss.
It seems that anything of belief is possible here, if so many are given to believe in the same things, and less are to say anything otherwise. You are left chronically aching at times, a sort of sick McCandless fatigue, you'd rather sleep in more often, and you think for the moment in the all is quiet room, peace is more pervasive here at least, and the prison walls were defined potentially different. You reason there is less to be said, it wouldn't matter if you were a Socrates, or anyone of significant import, sure if you were beyond the threshold of 'cold war' divisions, geographically in some other place, you might be cared for in some way of propaganda, but these days, one should imagine, it were merely celebrity that brought attention, and even celebrity weren't a place sanctuary, or there you wondered that you should likely be ironically safer where the abuses were more obvious? It seems to be a strange paradox doesn't it?! Hard to fear more what you've already feared and survived isn't it, if it is given enough to tolerable thresholds? Or that sadly, human rights activism would ensure if you were a crab you were more likely boiled safely and humanely at that as opposed to instantaneous horror, and the homeless have the opportunity of the potential firing squad with a barrage of bullets, as opposed to permanent internment elsewhere?
All along for years, you've apparently dealt with any number of circumstances that should be one of the same, conspiracies regenerate, cover ups ensue. Life is supposed to continue, history books aren't written correctly, or at least are inherently biased in perspective or sweeping sets of omissions.
On the one hand, rule of law and order, on the other hand, nothing of this truly exists, or this sort of formalism at least is merely the obstacle and hurdle in achieving any objective. But why important? Well, it seems more obvious in perspective, that if you wanted your neighbors land, it would be easier for outright 'cold blooded' seizure of property, or that if you wanted to dispense with political, never mind innocence, aims are easier to achieve, if they were 'sub human'. At least more obviously you run the transition between formally working 'evidence' for the sham to working more so the sham where it is more boldly obvious.
Where to go when its merely the repetition of a given number of events that seem to re surface from a given past, in fact, it seems more likely one should reason, no where to go. Conjecture here entails, more broadly a given divide runs more sharply along 'cold war' like divisions. Where it truly safer to be in Canada?
The flour bugs return, let's say after a cycle of a few years, you had been conditioned by way of conditioning here, abdominal cramping, fatigue, seemingly not healing right, and so forth on the order of months...you learn to stop cooking much, and do short order shopping, only because you reason on a basic level, that increased frequency of home invasions could lead to greater potential chance of intercept if all in theory were potentially as one possibly suspected but never fully knew. It seems if its high order scandal here the usual course is massive cover up(?), or at least veneered pretense and sham of saying anything defensible otherwise. At least when the flour bugs return, you reason maybe a little more likely safe. All along through one cycles lull to the next height though you seem steadfastly more conditioned to the wave, the wave moves on, and you are left managing 'life' which hardly seems right, and provides little consolations in some ways. At least you reason, you must have been sufficiently in the 'magic cave' to survive this one, and your prayers must have meant something, or at least, then you are conditioned all along either to believe you were imagining anything of that were thought (as in the great shutter island metropolis that would convince anyone they were truly crazy), and here even conditioning runs along the lines 'cold blooded and pathological', it is all thought right in this manner giving industries much pathological flexibility so as to allow for flawed engine switches, and so to potentially much more, if so many more were to walk in step with one another into some greater unseen abyss.
It seems that anything of belief is possible here, if so many are given to believe in the same things, and less are to say anything otherwise. You are left chronically aching at times, a sort of sick McCandless fatigue, you'd rather sleep in more often, and you think for the moment in the all is quiet room, peace is more pervasive here at least, and the prison walls were defined potentially different. You reason there is less to be said, it wouldn't matter if you were a Socrates, or anyone of significant import, sure if you were beyond the threshold of 'cold war' divisions, geographically in some other place, you might be cared for in some way of propaganda, but these days, one should imagine, it were merely celebrity that brought attention, and even celebrity weren't a place sanctuary, or there you wondered that you should likely be ironically safer where the abuses were more obvious? It seems to be a strange paradox doesn't it?! Hard to fear more what you've already feared and survived isn't it, if it is given enough to tolerable thresholds? Or that sadly, human rights activism would ensure if you were a crab you were more likely boiled safely and humanely at that as opposed to instantaneous horror, and the homeless have the opportunity of the potential firing squad with a barrage of bullets, as opposed to permanent internment elsewhere?
No comments:
Post a Comment