How politics makes us stupid

  One is to wonder if politics is merely to serve to a religious hoodwink of sorts, that is, the sort of indoctrination that we are provided to believe in, but in terms of the substantive measure of, for instance, something like industries, these may proceed in their own ways irrespective of legislative decision making.  In other words, if industry crisis are looming, reconciliation should seem likely a given consequence always irrespective of political outcomes.  For instances, shortages in a given energy sector of a given commodity X will likely mean, irrespective of partisan and governmental policy making differences will likely yield something of a change in return, some proponents/lobbyists argue de regulatory view on a particular issue, politicians concede the point, but with respect to substantiating gains in a given commodity X, this path provides no viable outcome with respect to gains in over production outcomes , but on the partisan side of things, this is all a given party wishes to discuss on the issue or the extent that wish to portray in so far as the scope of the given problem and possible solutions therein.  Thus it is really a moot point, and only meant to serve as, again, a hoodwink to the faithful, that what were truly a nominal gain in terms of measured success in improving industry production by removing legislative and legal hurdles, ends up neither tangibly providing little in return.  Likewise, then something else, one is to imagine is more likely to happen, whether this is the sort of, under reported, conspiracy whereby secretly something else has happened to solve these sorts of problems, or in other words, I wonder how much interests there is to serving truth with respect to politics and punditry.  Here then when disaster has struck, or secret political wheeling and dealing amounts to the sorts of changes (that pundits omit in discussion), we are left with the impression that our respective parties served us well in its choice making, and the fault lies elsewhere as preaching to the choir seems to serve, at least isn't always spun that way?!

 Or if outright manipulation, lies, deception, omission of truth, and so forth aren't the usual course of political punditry these days.... or maybe one is to wonder, how much good having Tenet standing behind you as you argue your case before the U.N.  assembly really means so much?!  :)

Wink, wink, seems like the relativistic power axioms are on the rise again...relativistic time is part of this hint I'd offer, but its an old one in the running...