The other part of the often times political divisions that are constructed for us, it would seem as though it were a binary one, like the division between delineated by religion and atheism.  Here as if the choice is provided by stark contrast as in choosing for the sake of the supposedly a lesser of two evils. 

Really, because it were an easy scapegoat, or that in the matter of talking about anything, here the issues that were presented to us were amounting to the division of examining, exactly how backwards any particular group or individual thought much to the exclusion of else, the sort of sacrifice leads to the inclination of not considering much in the way of issues relating to one's own condition much, or that candidates here could say anything and do anything for that matter, as long as they hadn't tread upon a given issue alone or series of them, yet another hoodwink.  Or a manner yet another artificial way of constructing and controlling social divisions between any particular group...and so arbitrary at times, that representing views and beliefs could be tossed with a coin and assigned.  And what should be the purpose here?  

If so much could be summed in essence to the failure of two party systems alone, its upon the contingent argument that one should sacrifice so much for a given party line...that is, whether a particular issue were to reign so heavily, or jade one's view in life, that settles much else, or as in recalling the failure of a democrats securing a past presidential election, green party candidacy spoils and robs.  The same could be said in like kind, on the opposite side.  

How so little confidence then of congress handling in general of anything with, one  should imagine, the prevalent belief that the other party's handling of issues were the likely culprit of all this.  Here if you were a conservative, you might be left to imagine, that the North East or the West Coast, were generally to be blame, or conservative Southerners and Midwesterner s were likely to blame in like kind.  :) Or entirely it seems that antagonism between two different starkly contrasting social political systems have arisen characterizing the difference that lay in this union.  But maybe this sort of contrast is a division served in different ways to different audience.  Admittedly I don't watch much of Marr, Stewart, Colbert, and incidentally have the misfortune, beyond the maybe 5 minute to 5 second tolerance of CNN of being subject to Fox, which admittedly to some could be like an innate hell in its own right, although more often I'd find what I hear amusing.  One is to gather news is there to inform or guide in our decision making, or as in the case, of some postings, the issue is really about considering not the turtle,  or you'd be a sheep otherwise, as if the focus all along were the turtle, or in some resort, aside from wormhole re use itself, by the littlest of little, wormholes which somehow inducted the limitation of the rights of kings, long since passage while at the same time, one describing the futility of speedy trials of kangaroo court systems...the issue is really about Lebowski here, and the limitation of the rights of kings, or confusing the matter more, entering the matrix, or the asshole that apparently didn't know how to park his car correctly, hence the car wreck, with the six pack of corona beer, and United Bank of Scotland, ensuring the Royal Bank of Scotland were handling the matter of cooked accounting books correctly.  

You see it all adds up there somewhere, and somewhere with the turtle, or about as sensible otherwise, given the level of absurdity to be found in Floyd tune, and then if it could be held to mystifying levels of absurdity, all this contingency amounting to the burdens of one man to take upon the burdens of billions alone in reconciling accounting errors, irregularities, of lies, treachery, deceit, and the list goes on and on...and on....

Here one were talking about the relevancy of anything, but relevancy were being irrelevant, and yet another way of saying let it go, or that for all this matter personal existence is considered less so, account role playing another matter, that succeeds in accomplishing exactly what, if ever could be certain here.  Leading into nothing exactly, and the cycle of zero sum manages to crop up.  Why so?  Commonly, it seems there is a matter of self awareness when victimization is on going, or when any one person is robbed otherwise, or that sad reality to the tragedy of humor itself.   The matter of time accounting seems a small pittance in like kind?!  There is little of the necessary stark contrast here, so one imagines, inventions of varying orders, here if only one could be portrayed shot dead by helicopters above in a live simulcast, it would be so much easier, or at least this were in part attempted it seems like in L.A. to some degree, only thereby involving a house on fire, and an ex cop gone astray, here things should be more sensibly wrong in the blatant sense, blatant as nearest to overt propaganda, or the sort of things constructed of a fictionally narrated reality...or that when it were exceedingly this obvious, one were climbing a chain to avoid the flame thrower.  Hence common denominator social politics, one should wonder?!  :)

Of course, it seems as much true for the whole of Australia at that, with one large drunken binge...or where Walkabout is about summing...  :)